HomeLast SearchCollections Workspace Citation Check Manuscripts

5,081,904 papers found

for “Review” · Showing 361–380 · 1877 ms

Sort:

Systematic ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2023
The Impact of Consumer Wearable Devices on Physical Activity and Adherence to Physical Activity in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Alam Sabrina, Zhang Mengna, Harris Kisa, +2 more·Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association
Abstract not available
PMID36445750
DOI10.1089/tmj.2022.0280
PMCIDNot available
PublisherSAGE Publications
View Publisher
ReviewOpen AccessPubMedCrossrefUnpaywall+1 more2013
Genetic deletions of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in head and neck cancer: review of the literature from 2000 to 2012.
Masood Nosheen, Yasmin Azra, Kayani Mahmood A·Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
Head and neck cancer is one of the leading causes of deaths worldwide. Two genes GSTM1 and GSTT1 involved in phase II of carcinogen detoxification have been frequently studied in the literature. Their null genotypes are thought to be associated with increased head and neck cancer risk. However, the published reviews ar…
PMID23886141
DOI10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.6.3535
PMCIDNot available
PublisherAsian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention
Open Full Text
Systematic ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2022
Oral pain in the cancer patient.
Samim Firoozeh, Epstein Joel B, Osagie Rachael·Current opinion in supportive and palliative care
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Oral pain is a common complaint in patients with cancer. This review aims to summarize the knowledge on the causes and approach to management of oral pain garnered over the past 2 years. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic review and meta-analysis included in the review, assessed cannabinoid versus placeb…
PMID35929564
DOI10.1097/spc.0000000000000608
PMCIDNot available
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
View Publisher
Open AccessPubMedUnpaywallCrossref+1 more2026
Characterizing updated and living meta-analyses part 1: a methodological scoping review on methods for conducting meta-analyses in updated and living systematic reviews.
Konstantinidis Menelaos, Kontouli Katerina-Maria, Zhelnov Pavel, +6 more·Journal of clinical epidemiology
OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews (SRs) provide the highest level of evidence for clinical and policy decision-making but quickly become outdated as new studies emerge. Updated systematic reviews (USRs) and living systematic reviews (LSRs) offer 2 frameworks to maintain currency; however, statistical approaches for repeat…
PMID42331113
DOI10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112389
PMCIDNot available
PublisherElsevier BV
Open Full Text
Systematic ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2014
Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review.
Meher S, Alfirevic Z·BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
BACKGROUND: The inappropriate and inconsistent selection of primary outcomes (POs) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) can make evidence difficult to interpret, limiting its usefulness to inform clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the choice and consistency of POs in…
PMID24571433
DOI10.1111/1471-0528.12593
PMCIDNot available
PublisherWiley
View Publisher
ReviewAbstract OnlyPubMed2004
The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.
Levine Alan M, Heckman James D, Hensinger Robert N·Instructional course lectures
The peer review process is integral to the functioning of all scientific journals and plays a pivotal role in the publication of new scientific material. Timeliness, freedom from bias, and proper review etiquette are essential for an effective review. Each type of scientific article demands a slightly different reviewi…
PMID15116658
DOINot available
PMCIDNot available
View on PubMed
ReviewFree PDFPubMedPMCUnpaywall+3 more2014
The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.
Mulholland Robert C·European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
Abstract not available
PMID24384830
DOI10.1007/s00586-013-3126-5
PMCIDPMC3897807
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
Open PDF (web)
Systematic ReviewFree PDFPubMedUnpaywallCrossref+2 more2013
Can we prioritise which databases to search? A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management.
Beyer Fiona R, Wright Kath·Health information and libraries journal
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews risk producing biased conclusions if a comprehensive search to identify eligible studies is not undertaken, but little evidence exists to guide prioritisation of databases to search when resources are limited. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review examining interventions for managing frozen sh…
PMID23413793
DOI10.1111/hir.12009
PMCIDNot available
PublisherWiley
Open PDF (web)
ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2020
Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol.
Andersen Mikkel Zola, Gülen Sengül, Fonnes Siv, +2 more·Journal of clinical epidemiology
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to examine the time from publication of the protocol for a Cochrane review to publication of the Cochrane review for the entire Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Cochrane reviews from the CDSR published between 1995 and 2019 were assess…
PMID32413390
DOI10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.011
PMCIDNot available
PublisherElsevier BV
View Publisher
ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2006
Ganglioglioma of optic chiasma: case report and review of literature.
Pant Ishita, Suri Vaishali, Chaturvedi Sujata, +2 more·Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
CASE REPORT: We report a case of ganglioglioma of the optic chiasma in an 8-year-old child who presented with gradual deterioration of vision since the age of 3 years and complete loss by 8 years. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: Intensive literature search by the authors showed only 12 cases of ganglioglioma involving the visua…
PMID16404642
DOI10.1007/s00381-005-0013-3
PMCIDNot available
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
View Publisher
Systematic ReviewAbstract OnlyPubMed2000
[The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].
Eliasson M·Lakartidningen
The traditional narrative review has been shown repeatedly to be biased, mostly towards exaggerated treatment size effects. In contrast, the systematic review follows a strict protocol regarding focused questions, explicit criteria for literature searches, inclusion and exclusion criteria, critical appraisal and a synt…
PMID10900892
DOINot available
PMCIDNot available
View on PubMed
ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2009
Postoperative chondrolysis of the knee: 3 case reports and a review of the literature.
Fester Eric W, Noyes Frank R·The American journal of sports medicine
Abstract not available
PMID19535664
DOI10.1177/0363546509334999
PMCIDNot available
PublisherSAGE Publications
View Publisher
ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2008
Learning disabilities is bigger than a cursory review.
Caan Woody, Toocaram Jill·British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
Abstract not available
PMID18414277
DOI10.12968/bjon.2008.17.2.28132
PMCIDNot available
PublisherMark Allen Group
View Publisher
ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2003
Systematic literature reviews.
Wood Marilynn J·Clinical nursing research
Abstract not available
PMID12583496
DOI10.1177/1054773803238736
PMCIDNot available
PublisherSAGE Publications
View Publisher
ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2013
Non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor as an incidentaloma--a case report and review of literature.
Rustagi Tarun, Rai Mridula, Bauer Frank·Journal of gastrointestinal cancer
Abstract not available
PMID23065708
DOI10.1007/s12029-012-9445-7
PMCIDNot available
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
View Publisher
Publisher AccessPubMedCrossref2025
Incorporating non-randomized evidence in cochrane intervention reviews: a scoping review.
Axon Emma, Kanellopoulou Afroditi, Tsokani Sofia, +3 more·Journal of clinical epidemiology
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: "Non-randomized studies of interventions" (NRSI) can provide valuable insights into the real-world performance of interventions, especially when randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are impractical, unethical, or lack generalizability. We investigated how Cochrane authors have incorporated evid…
PMID40324697
DOI10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111814
PMCIDNot available
PublisherElsevier BV
View Publisher
ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref2011
Current world literature.
Current opinion in neurology
Abstract not available
PMID21734498
DOI10.1097/wco.0b013e3283499d51
PMCIDNot available
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
View Publisher
Systematic ReviewAbstract OnlyPubMedPMC2006
Best practices in EMR implementation: a systematic review.
Keshavjee K, Bosomworth J, Copen J, +4 more·AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
As experience with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) implementations increases, new knowledge is gained on how to make these implementations more successful. Recently, several new conceptual frameworks described in the literature provide a richer understanding of what makes an EMR implementation successful. Using the sys…
PMID17238601
DOINot available
PMCIDPMC1839412
View on PubMed
ReviewPublisher AccessPubMedCrossref1993
The science of reviewing research.
Oxman A D, Guyatt G H·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract not available
PMID8192290
DOI10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26342.x
PMCIDNot available
PublisherWiley
View Publisher
ReviewOpen AccessPubMedUnpaywallCrossref+1 more2021
Optimising the process for conducting scoping reviews.
Pawliuk Colleen, Brown Helen L, Widger Kim, +5 more·BMJ evidence-based medicine
Knowledge synthesis constitutes a key part of evidence-based medicine and a scoping review is a type of knowledge synthesis that maps the breadth of literature on a topic. Conducting a scoping review is resource intensive and, as a result, it can be challenging to maintain best practices throughout the process. Much of…
PMID33087454
DOI10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111452
PMCIDNot available
PublisherBMJ
Open Full Text

Searching PubMed for “Review” and checking full-text availability…

5,081,904 papers found

The Impact of Consumer Wearable Devices on Physical Activity and Adherence to Physical Activity in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Genetic deletions of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in head and neck cancer: review of the literature from 2000 to 2012.

Oral pain in the cancer patient.

Characterizing updated and living meta-analyses part 1: a methodological scoping review on methods for conducting meta-analyses in updated and living systematic reviews.

Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review.

The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.

The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.

Can we prioritise which databases to search? A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management.

Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol.

Ganglioglioma of optic chiasma: case report and review of literature.

[The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].

Postoperative chondrolysis of the knee: 3 case reports and a review of the literature.

Learning disabilities is bigger than a cursory review.

Systematic literature reviews.

Non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor as an incidentaloma--a case report and review of literature.

Incorporating non-randomized evidence in cochrane intervention reviews: a scoping review.

Current world literature.

Best practices in EMR implementation: a systematic review.

The science of reviewing research.

Optimising the process for conducting scoping reviews.

5,081,904 papers found

The Impact of Consumer Wearable Devices on Physical Activity and Adherence to Physical Activity in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Genetic deletions of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in head and neck cancer: review of the literature from 2000 to 2012.

Oral pain in the cancer patient.

Characterizing updated and living meta-analyses part 1: a methodological scoping review on methods for conducting meta-analyses in updated and living systematic reviews.

Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review.

The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.

The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.

Can we prioritise which databases to search? A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management.

Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol.

Ganglioglioma of optic chiasma: case report and review of literature.

[The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].

Postoperative chondrolysis of the knee: 3 case reports and a review of the literature.

Learning disabilities is bigger than a cursory review.

Systematic literature reviews.

Non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor as an incidentaloma--a case report and review of literature.

Incorporating non-randomized evidence in cochrane intervention reviews: a scoping review.

Current world literature.

Best practices in EMR implementation: a systematic review.

The science of reviewing research.

Optimising the process for conducting scoping reviews.