Searching PubMed for “Review” and checking full-text availability…
for “Review” · Showing 381–400 · 1845 ms
Fester Eric W, Noyes Frank R·The American journal of sports medicine
Abstract not available
Guruprasad Prajwal, Sivaram Pranav, Bombard Pierce, +3 more·Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)
BackgroundPhysical therapy and exercise form the cornerstone of plantar fasciitis management, and clinicians rely heavily on systematic reviews to navigate a crowded and heterogeneous evidence base. Exercise interventions are inherently difficult to blind, outcome measures vary widely across trials, and protocols diffe…
Rustagi Tarun, Rai Mridula, Bauer Frank·Journal of gastrointestinal cancer
Abstract not available
Nussbaumer-Streit Barbara, Booth Andrew, Garritty Chantelle, +4 more·Journal of clinical epidemiology
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence syntheses systematically compile and analyze information from multiple sources to support health-care decision-making. As many different types of questions need to be answered in health care, different evidence synthesis types have emerged. In this article, we introduce the most comm…
Barbosa Fabiano Timbó, Lira Amanda Bastos, Oliveira Neto Olavo Barbosa de, +5 more·Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The systematic review of randomized clinical trials is crucial to assess the safety and effectiveness of intermediate procedures. The objective of this article is to present a tutorial for the planning and execution of systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trial studies.…
Pawliuk Colleen, Brown Helen L, Widger Kim, +5 more·BMJ evidence-based medicine
Knowledge synthesis constitutes a key part of evidence-based medicine and a scoping review is a type of knowledge synthesis that maps the breadth of literature on a topic. Conducting a scoping review is resource intensive and, as a result, it can be challenging to maintain best practices throughout the process. Much of…
Abdelghani Mahmoud, Yeh Yi-Ting, Eden Rebekah, +5 more·Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association
Objective With the digital transformation of hospitals having unfolded globally, it is important to understand the impacts of eHealth on hospital practice. This study aims to update two previous narrative reviews of systematic reviews and assess: (1) what is the current state of eHealth impacts in hospitals? and (2) ho…
Stull J T·The Journal of biological chemistry
Abstract not available
Current opinion in neurology
Abstract not available
Reed Jason B, Ammar Amina, Giuliano Christopher·Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP
Scoping reviews are similar to systematic reviews in that they are designed to be transparent and reproducible processes to answer a question while reducing bias. The key difference between scoping reviews and the better-known systematic review method is the scope of the question being answered. Scoping reviews are bes…
Grol R P, van Everdingen J J, Kuipers F, +1 more·Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Abstract not available
MacLure Katie, Paudyal Vibhu, Stewart Derek·International journal of clinical pharmacy
Introduction Professor Archibald Cochrane, after whom the Cochrane Collaboration is named, was influential in promoting evidence-based clinical practice. He called for "relevant, valid research" to underpin all aspects of healthcare. Systematic reviews of the literature are regarded as a high quality source of cumulati…
Kupila Sakris K E, Joki Anu, Suojanen Laura-U, +1 more·Current obesity reports
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of eHealth interventions for weight loss and weight loss maintenance among adults with overweight or obesity through a systematic review of systematic reviews. RECENT FINDINGS: This study included 26 systematic reviews, covering a total…
Oxman A D, Guyatt G H·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract not available
Wood Marilynn J·Clinical nursing research
Abstract not available
McGrath Trevor A, Bossuyt Patrick M, Cronin Paul, +4 more·Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
As defined by the Cochrane Collaboration, a systematic review is a review of evidence with a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant primary research, and to extract and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. Met…
Malmivaara Antti, Komulainen Jorma·Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja
Systematic reviews aim to systematically identify, critically assess and summarise all relevant studies on a specific topic. The present article gives advice on how to find, assess and exploit systematic review on effectiveness. Systematic reviews on effectiveness constitute a source of knowledge for professionals with…
Needleman Ian G·Journal of clinical periodontology
Systematic reviews have become widely used for evaluating evidence across all fields of biomedicine. The objective of a systematic review is to provide a comprehensive and contemporary appraisal of research using transparent methods whilst aiming to minimize bias. In essence, research methodology is employed in the con…
Zauza Dionatan, Dotto Lara, Moher David, +3 more·Journal of dentistry
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reporting of authors' justifications for choosing the scoping review methodology in oral health. STUDY SELECTION, DATA AND SOURCE: This is a meta-research study about scoping reviews in dentistry. This study searched for reviews in PubMed and Scopus without year restrictions and restricted t…
Kim Jin Kyu, Chua Michael Erlano, Li Tian Ge, +2 more·BMJ evidence-based medicine
OBJECTIVE: To assess custom GPT-4 performance in extracting and evaluating data from medical literature to assist in the systematic review (SR) process. DESIGN: A proof-of-concept comparative study was conducted to assess the accuracy and precision of custom GPT-4 models against human-performed reviews of randomised c…