Cochrane collaborative review group on peripheral vascular disease: review abstracts.
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
Abstract not available
Searching PubMed for “Review” and checking full-text availability…
for “Review” · Showing 381–400 · 2059 ms
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
Abstract not available
Eliasson M·Lakartidningen
The traditional narrative review has been shown repeatedly to be biased, mostly towards exaggerated treatment size effects. In contrast, the systematic review follows a strict protocol regarding focused questions, explicit criteria for literature searches, inclusion and exclusion criteria, critical appraisal and a synt…
Beyer Fiona R, Wright Kath·Health information and libraries journal
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews risk producing biased conclusions if a comprehensive search to identify eligible studies is not undertaken, but little evidence exists to guide prioritisation of databases to search when resources are limited. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review examining interventions for managing frozen sh…
Seok Ji-Woo, Kim Jung-Dae, Kim Jaeuk U, +1 more·Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Balance impairment is a major motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD), leading to falls, reduced mobility, and lower quality of life. Despite advances in pharmacological and rehabilitation approaches, postural instability often persists, requiring effective adjunctive interventions. Vibration therapy (VT) is a non-in…
Tapia-Benavente Luis, Vergara-Merino Laura, Garegnani Luis Ignacio, +3 more·Medwave
This article is the first in a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to present rapid reviews, compare them with systematic reviews, and mention how they can be used. Rapid reviews use a methodology like systematic reviews, but through shor…
Fester Eric W, Noyes Frank R·The American journal of sports medicine
Abstract not available
Samim Firoozeh, Epstein Joel B, Osagie Rachael·Current opinion in supportive and palliative care
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Oral pain is a common complaint in patients with cancer. This review aims to summarize the knowledge on the causes and approach to management of oral pain garnered over the past 2 years. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic review and meta-analysis included in the review, assessed cannabinoid versus placeb…
Koç İrem, Goodwin John, Hegarty Josephine·Cancer medicine
AIMS: Healthcare providers need access to evidence-based knowledge to deliver interventions effectively within clinical settings. This paper aims to provide an overview of umbrella reviews (URs) conducted in an oncology healthcare context. In this review, the oncology healthcare context relates to focusing on care deli…
Caan Woody, Toocaram Jill·British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
Abstract not available
Mulholland Robert C·European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
Abstract not available
Current opinion in neurology
Abstract not available
Stull J T·The Journal of biological chemistry
Abstract not available
Nussbaumer-Streit Barbara, Booth Andrew, Garritty Chantelle, +4 more·Journal of clinical epidemiology
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence syntheses systematically compile and analyze information from multiple sources to support health-care decision-making. As many different types of questions need to be answered in health care, different evidence synthesis types have emerged. In this article, we introduce the most comm…
Malmivaara Antti, Komulainen Jorma·Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja
Systematic reviews aim to systematically identify, critically assess and summarise all relevant studies on a specific topic. The present article gives advice on how to find, assess and exploit systematic review on effectiveness. Systematic reviews on effectiveness constitute a source of knowledge for professionals with…
Wood Marilynn J·Clinical nursing research
Abstract not available
Clarke Mike, Williamson Paula R·Systematic reviews
Systematic reviews seek to bring together research evidence to answer the question for the review. The reviewers usually wish to compare, contrast and, if appropriate, combine the findings of the existing research studies. However, these intentions are often thwarted by inconsistencies in the outcomes that were measure…
Pawliuk Colleen, Brown Helen L, Widger Kim, +5 more·BMJ evidence-based medicine
Knowledge synthesis constitutes a key part of evidence-based medicine and a scoping review is a type of knowledge synthesis that maps the breadth of literature on a topic. Conducting a scoping review is resource intensive and, as a result, it can be challenging to maintain best practices throughout the process. Much of…
Grol R P, van Everdingen J J, Kuipers F, +1 more·Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Abstract not available
MacLure Katie, Paudyal Vibhu, Stewart Derek·International journal of clinical pharmacy
Introduction Professor Archibald Cochrane, after whom the Cochrane Collaboration is named, was influential in promoting evidence-based clinical practice. He called for "relevant, valid research" to underpin all aspects of healthcare. Systematic reviews of the literature are regarded as a high quality source of cumulati…
Oxman A D, Guyatt G H·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract not available