392,528 papers found

Meta-analysis is a quantitative approach for systematically combining the results of previous studies in order to arrive at conclusions about the body of research. It answers a specific research question, includes an explicit methodology section, employs strategies to minimize bias, yields objective findings and enable…

A meta-analysis of the reliability of the scores from a specific test, also called reliability generalization, allows the quantitative synthesis of its properties from a set of studies. It is usually assumed that part of the variation in the reliability coefficients is due to some unknown and implicit mechanism that re…

Surgical approach for radical prostatectomy is even today a subject of debate in the urologic community. Many comparative studies between retropubic and laparoscopic approach (robotic assisted or not) were reported since 10 years without being able to decide between the supporters of retropubic or laparoscopic app…

Meta-analysis of individual patient data (MIPD) is considered as one of the statistical approaches to provide integrated information on the effect of a treatment or an intervention. Statistical analysis of such meta-analyses should account for the clustered structure of data which is induced by all factors varying acro…

In this column, we comment on the state of the science regarding psychotherapy for youths (including children and adolescents) with depression. We begin by discussing our recent meta-analysis of the youth depression clinical trials literature to illustrate how meta-analysis can be of use to clinicians. We consider how…

Although spondylitis is the most common of the complications of brucellosis, and is often debilitating and difficult to treat, there is no consensus on the preferred combination of antibiotics used. We attempted to perform a meta-analysis based on series on brucellar spondylitis published in the last 22 years. Meta-ana…

Systematic literature reviews with meta-analysis of reported data in diagnostic research studies about the accuracy of tests assist clinicians in decision-making. However, there are limitations to this approach as the analysis of such data often does not allow reviewers to explore the diagnostic information gained from…

Among clinical trials assessing a given treatment, often parallel and cross-over designs are used together. In the first paper of a series of three, we explore two methods to pool continuous outcomes in a meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over trial designs: the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the standardi…

Meta-analyses are subject to bias for many of reasons, including publication bias. Asymmetry in a funnel plot of study size against treatment effect is often used to identify such bias. We compare the performance of three simple methods of testing for bias: the rank correlation method; a simple linear regression of the…

Meta-analysis is a popular tool for combining evidence from several related studies. The technique is usually used to combine randomized clinical trials, case-control studies or prospective studies where each study has its own exposed and unexposed groups. By including separate 'study effects' (either fixed or random),…

Meta-analysis was proposed more than 20 years ago as an innovative technique for pooling the results of a series of clinical studies. This technique has a two-fold purpose: i) to retrieve pertinent clinical information without introducing selection biases; ii) to combine these clinical data obtained from different sour…

Reliable syntheses are more and more needed by physicians. In the therapeutic field, this need is illustrated by the growing number of syntheses using meta-analysis tools. Some of these syntheses are based on individual patient data, and this offers three kinds of advantages: the favourable consequences of a collaborat…

Use of meta-analytical (quantitative overview) techniques is now commonplace in a large range of medical-research contexts, with a rapid rise in its frequency of use being particularly apparent in the last decade. Many methods of meta-analysis have been proposed and used, from crude 'vote-counting' of studies showing s…

A meta-analysis was conducted of studies examining the relation between Type A behavior and chronic emotional distress as measured by standard psychological scales. Aggregating across all studies, the average effect size was .27, indicating a positive association between Type A and chronic dysphoria; however, there was…

A meta-analysis of all nine available controlled trials of corticosteroids for adjunctive therapy for bacterial meningitis was performed. Risks of various outcomes were assessed for control and treatment groups from each study, and risk differences were determined. For each outcome a weighted average of the individual…

Clinical trials studying the influence of hospital practices on breast-feeding duration were combined in a meta-analysis. Nine studies were selected. The global quality score was poor, and varied between 11.6 and 71.5 (Chalmers' scale). The results of each study were pooled using Peto's method and showed the following…

Using a metascience framework for improving meta-analyses, Jansen et al. (2025) tested the accuracy and efficiency of data extraction from primary studies used in meta-analyses with a range of large language models. Efficiency was impressive: Across thousands of studies and hundreds of variables, eight large language m…

Kalhor et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on predictors of exclusive breastfeeding, offering valuable insights but facing methodological challenges. Despite a robust search strategy, PROSPERO registration, and use of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, heterogeneity remained high (I² >85%), with…

Meta-analysis assigns more weight to studies with smaller standard errors to maximize the precision of the overall estimate. In observational settings, however, standard errors are shaped by methodological decisions. These decisions can interact with publication bias and p-hacking, potentially leading to spuriously pre…

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary To assess the comparative benefits and harms of immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for people with generalised myasthenia gravis through a network meta-analysis. Secondary To estimate the relative ranking of immunomodul…