Searching PubMed for “Review” and checking full-text availability…
for “Review” · Showing 7,341–7,360 · 2176 ms
Botella de Maglia J, Belenguer Tarín J E·Anales de medicina interna (Madrid, Spain : 1984)
Abstract not available
Rehm J·Addiction (Abingdon, England)
Abstract not available
Søreide E, Steen P A·BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Abstract not available
Woolf S H·American journal of preventive medicine
Abstract not available
Squires B P·CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
Abstract not available
Utsumi K·Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research
Abstract not available
Steiner T J·Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache
The Cochrane Collaboration uses rigorous and widely accepted methods, together with peer-review, to produce systematic reviews of all data of acceptable scientific quality relating to specified aspects of healthcare. Review Groups exist for a number of areas of medicine and surgery, but at present not headache. It is a…
Carlton P L, Strawderman W E·Biological psychiatry
Virtually all reviews of cumulated studies rely on statistical significance as a criterion for evaluating the reproducibility of the phenomenon under review. Despite its nearly universal application, that criterion is entirely inadequate: Its application is very likely to lead a reviewer to conclude that a phenomenon d…
Miller Ann Neville, Todd Andrew, Toledo Robert, +1 more·Health communication
The concept of racial, ethnic, or cultural concordance between a healthcare provider and a patient has emerged as a dimension of the patient-physician relationship that could influence health outcomes for minoritized patients, particularly through differences in the way physicians communicate with patients of various r…
Carter-Templeton Heather, Wrigley Jordan, Nicoll Leslie H, +3 more·ANS. Advances in nursing science
Reviews in the nursing scientific literature have steadily expanded in scope and range. This has resulted in a variety of terms used to describe these reports found in bibliographic databases, creating confusion. This study investigated the status of reviews in the published nursing literature, including: (1) number of…
Cooper Nicola J, Jones David R, Sutton Alex J·Clinical trials (London, England)
BACKGROUND: The importance of systematic reviews in identifying gaps in the evidence base and providing a quantitative basis for informing new research initiatives is widely acknowledged, but little is known about what actually happens in practice. Our objective was to assess the use made of results of reviews in the d…
Cook D J, Mulrow C D, Haynes R B·Annals of internal medicine
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing large bodies of evidence and helping to explain differences among studies on the same question. A systematic review involves the application of scientific strategies, in ways that limit bias, to the assembly, critical apprai…
Tong Elisa K, England Lucinda, Glantz Stanton A·Pediatrics
BACKGROUND: Prenatal and postnatal exposure to tobacco smoke adversely affects maternal and child health. Secondhand smoke (SHS) has been linked causally with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in major health reports. In 1992, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) first noted an association between SHS and SID…
Giles Tracey, King Lindy, de Lacey Sheryl·ANS. Advances in nursing science
The timing of the literature review in grounded theory has been debated for decades, with previous recommendations to delay the review now under question. Mounting evidence suggests that a preliminary review can enhance theoretical sensitivity and rigor and may lead to innovative insights. However, researchers must ack…
Rössner S, Astrup A·Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity
Abstract not available
Rethlefsen Melissa L, Schroter Sara, Bouter Lex M, +10 more·BMJ evidence-based medicine
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of adding librarians and information specialists (LIS) as methodological peer reviewers to the formal journal peer review process on the quality of search reporting and risk of bias in systematic review searches in the medical literature. DESIGN: Pragmatic two-group parallel randomise…
Rethlefsen Melissa L, Price Carrie, Schroter Sara·BMJ open
OBJECTIVES: To explore the perspectives of librarians and information specialists (LIS) on their experience and impact as peer reviewers of systematic reviews (SRs), and on facilitators and barriers to LIS methodological peer review. DESIGN: Survey and focus groups. SETTING: We surveyed LIS who completed a peer revie…
Kotzerke Jörg·Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine
Abstract not available
Kaltabanis Demo, Smye Victoria, Oudshoorn Abe, +1 more·BMJ open
INTRODUCTION: The increase in nicotine vaping among youth has emerged as a critical public health concern. Vaping among youth is linked to adverse health outcomes, including nicotine addiction, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases and mental health challenges. Recently, there has been a growing demand for research to…
Rombey Tanja, Allers Katharina, Mathes Tim, +2 more·BMC medical research methodology
BACKGROUND: An a priori design is essential to reduce the risk of bias in systematic reviews (SRs). To this end, authors can register their SR with PROSPERO, and/or publish a SR protocol in an academic journal. The latter has the advantage that the manuscript for the SR protocol is usually peer-reviewed. However, since…